<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SportsJudge Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog</link>
	<description>Fantasy Sports Dispute Resolution ... by Law Professors, Retired Judges, and Other Legal Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:25:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantasy Teams&#8217; Starting Lineups by Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9154-T: Fantasy Football Owner Seeks Court Order to Avoid Performing Bikram Yoga in a Sweatsuit &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1446#comment-10601</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9154-T: Fantasy Football Owner Seeks Court Order to Avoid Performing Bikram Yoga in a Sweatsuit &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1446#comment-10601</guid>
		<description>[...] SportsJudge Blog   Fantasy Sports Dispute Resolution &#8230; by Law Professors, Retired Judges, and Other Legal Experts    Skip to content Home        &#8592; Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantas... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SportsJudge Blog   Fantasy Sports Dispute Resolution &#8230; by Law Professors, Retired Judges, and Other Legal Experts    Skip to content Home        &larr; Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantas&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Football Dispute No. 8187-R: Owner Too Slow in Challenging Roster Error; Loses Greg Jennings for Completed Weeks by Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9154-T: Fantasy Football Owner Seeks Court Order to Avoid Performing Bikram Yoga in a Sweatsuit &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=971#comment-10600</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9154-T: Fantasy Football Owner Seeks Court Order to Avoid Performing Bikram Yoga in a Sweatsuit &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=971#comment-10600</guid>
		<description>[...] For those unfamiliar with the equitable doctrine of laches, this court has explained in the past that the doctrine entails “the failure to assert one’s legal rights in a timely manner. A successful defense of laches will find the court denying the request for equitable relief.”)  (See Web Opinion No. 8187-R: Gold Fantasy Football League v. Black &amp; Gold Team (Dec. 11, 2010); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those unfamiliar with the equitable doctrine of laches, this court has explained in the past that the doctrine entails “the failure to assert one’s legal rights in a timely manner. A successful defense of laches will find the court denying the request for equitable relief.”)  (See Web Opinion No. 8187-R: Gold Fantasy Football League v. Black &amp; Gold Team (Dec. 11, 2010); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bang to Gavel: SportsJudge Decisions of Note (October 2007) by Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantasy Teams&#8217; Starting Lineups &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=38#comment-10106</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantasy Teams&#8217; Starting Lineups &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=38#comment-10106</guid>
		<description>[...] From time to time, this court has overridden a fantasy owner’s intended starting lineup.  For example, Team Anadrol v. Vegas Baby &amp; Flathead Yankees, this court ruled that an out-of-contention fantasy baseball team may not bench all of his hitters to help another owner to pass him in the hitting categories of league standings.  (See Web Opinion No. 955-T, Commissioner v. Vegas Baby &amp; Flathead Yankees) (Case No. 1, Nov. 7, 2...).  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From time to time, this court has overridden a fantasy owner’s intended starting lineup.  For example, Team Anadrol v. Vegas Baby &amp; Flathead Yankees, this court ruled that an out-of-contention fantasy baseball team may not bench all of his hitters to help another owner to pass him in the hitting categories of league standings.  (See Web Opinion No. 955-T, Commissioner v. Vegas Baby &amp; Flathead Yankees) (Case No. 1, Nov. 7, 2&#8230;).  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9137-T:  Court Find 4-for-3 Blockbuster &#8216;Best&#8217; for All Parties by Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantasy Teams&#8217; Starting Lineups &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1300#comment-10105</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Sports Dispute No. 9153-R: Absent Bad Faith, SportsJudge Court Will Not Change Fantasy Teams&#8217; Starting Lineups &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1300#comment-10105</guid>
		<description>[...] owner is awarded “a level of reasonable discretion” in choosing his team’s strategies.  (See Web Opinion No. 9137-T, Commissioner of the EP Rules League v. Lean Mean Dizzy Machine &amp; Trooper...).  Thus, absent contrary language in a league constitution, “a level of reasonable discretion” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] owner is awarded “a level of reasonable discretion” in choosing his team’s strategies.  (See Web Opinion No. 9137-T, Commissioner of the EP Rules League v. Lean Mean Dizzy Machine &amp; Trooper&#8230;).  Thus, absent contrary language in a league constitution, “a level of reasonable discretion” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Baseball Dispute 8165-T: SportsJudge.com Rejects Trade of Longoria for Howard &amp; Sabathia by Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9152-T: Court Rejects Trade of Calvin Johnson for Brady &#38; Welker &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=916#comment-10101</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9152-T: Court Rejects Trade of Calvin Johnson for Brady &#38; Welker &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=916#comment-10101</guid>
		<description>[...] This court has long made a practice of rejecting 2-for-1 trades of this nature, in which the two main players are of nearly identical value, and the trade seems intended to solely pass a third, very strong player off to a contender.  For example, in the 2010 fantasy baseball case EP Rules League v. Yoon’s Goons &amp; McNack—involving the same 2-player keeper structure”— the court rejected the trade of Ryan Longoria &amp; C.C. Sabathia for Evan Longoria, noting that Howard and Longoria were of nearly equal value, and thus the trade appeared to be an attempt to simply pass Sabathia off to a contender.   (Web Opinion No. 8165-T, EP Rules League v. Yoon’s Goons and McNack). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This court has long made a practice of rejecting 2-for-1 trades of this nature, in which the two main players are of nearly identical value, and the trade seems intended to solely pass a third, very strong player off to a contender.  For example, in the 2010 fantasy baseball case EP Rules League v. Yoon’s Goons &amp; McNack—involving the same 2-player keeper structure”— the court rejected the trade of Ryan Longoria &amp; C.C. Sabathia for Evan Longoria, noting that Howard and Longoria were of nearly equal value, and thus the trade appeared to be an attempt to simply pass Sabathia off to a contender.   (Web Opinion No. 8165-T, EP Rules League v. Yoon’s Goons and McNack). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9137-T:  Court Find 4-for-3 Blockbuster &#8216;Best&#8217; for All Parties by Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9152-T: Court Rejects Trade of Calvin Johnson for Brady &#38; Welker &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1300#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9152-T: Court Rejects Trade of Calvin Johnson for Brady &#38; Welker &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1300#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>[...] scoring methods, plus a heavy weight on points per reception (Reception: Touchdown Ratio = 1:6).  (See Web Opinion No. 9137-T: EP Rules Fantasy Football League v. Lean Mean Dizzy Machine &amp; Troope...).  The league consists of three divisions of four teams each.  (Id.).  Winners of each division, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scoring methods, plus a heavy weight on points per reception (Reception: Touchdown Ratio = 1:6).  (See Web Opinion No. 9137-T: EP Rules Fantasy Football League v. Lean Mean Dizzy Machine &amp; Troope&#8230;).  The league consists of three divisions of four teams each.  (Id.).  Winners of each division, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Baseball Dispute 8165-T: SportsJudge.com Rejects Trade of Longoria for Howard &amp; Sabathia by Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9150-T: Court Rejects Trade of Brady, Welker &#38; Ingram for E. Manning, Nicks &#38; Benson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=916#comment-9940</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9150-T: Court Rejects Trade of Brady, Welker &#38; Ingram for E. Manning, Nicks &#38; Benson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=916#comment-9940</guid>
		<description>[...] future benefit has to be concrete, substantial and imminent in light of the players traded.”  (Web Opinion No. 8165-T, EP Rules League v. Yoon’s Goons and McNack) (rejecting the argument that Even Longoria was a substantial keeper upgrade over Ryan Howard based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] future benefit has to be concrete, substantial and imminent in light of the players traded.”  (Web Opinion No. 8165-T, EP Rules League v. Yoon’s Goons and McNack) (rejecting the argument that Even Longoria was a substantial keeper upgrade over Ryan Howard based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9138-T:  Ray Rice Trade Rejected in Vegas Porn Stars League by Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9150-T: Court Rejects Trade of Brady, Welker &#38; Ingram for E. Manning, Nicks &#38; Benson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1305#comment-9939</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9150-T: Court Rejects Trade of Brady, Welker &#38; Ingram for E. Manning, Nicks &#38; Benson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1305#comment-9939</guid>
		<description>[...] worse counterparts.   That is impermissible under traditional fantasy league rules. (See, e.g., Web Opinion No. 9138-T, Vegas Porn Stars League v. Edmonton Soilers &amp; Fort Lee Rub N’ Tuck; Web Opinion No. 9144-T, International Couch Potato League v. Mean Machine &amp; First and Goal) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worse counterparts.   That is impermissible under traditional fantasy league rules. (See, e.g., Web Opinion No. 9138-T, Vegas Porn Stars League v. Edmonton Soilers &amp; Fort Lee Rub N’ Tuck; Web Opinion No. 9144-T, International Couch Potato League v. Mean Machine &amp; First and Goal) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9137-T:  Court Find 4-for-3 Blockbuster &#8216;Best&#8217; for All Parties by Fantasy Football Trade Dispute No. 9151-T: Court Approves 3-Team, 10 Player Trade Featuring Mike Wallace &#38; Fred Jackson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1300#comment-9931</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Trade Dispute No. 9151-T: Court Approves 3-Team, 10 Player Trade Featuring Mike Wallace &#38; Fred Jackson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1300#comment-9931</guid>
		<description>[...] scoring methods, plus a heavy weight on points per reception (Reception: Touchdown Ratio = 1:6).  (See Web Opinion No. 9137-T: EP Rules Fantasy Football League v. Lean Mean Dizzy Machine &amp; Troope...).  The league consists of three divisions of four teams each.  (Id.).  Winners of each division, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scoring methods, plus a heavy weight on points per reception (Reception: Touchdown Ratio = 1:6).  (See Web Opinion No. 9137-T: EP Rules Fantasy Football League v. Lean Mean Dizzy Machine &amp; Troope&#8230;).  The league consists of three divisions of four teams each.  (Id.).  Winners of each division, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fantasy Baseball Dispute No. 9122-T: Court Rejects Trade of Ryan Howard, Chris Young and Elvin Andrus for Adrian Gonzalez by Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9150-T: Court Rejects Trade of Brady, Welker &#38; Ingram for E. Manning, Nicks &#38; Benson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</title>
		<link>http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1117#comment-9790</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy Football Dispute No. 9150-T: Court Rejects Trade of Brady, Welker &#38; Ingram for E. Manning, Nicks &#38; Benson &#124; SportsJudge Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsjudge.com/sjblog/?p=1117#comment-9790</guid>
		<description>[...] benefits both teams if it allows both teams a reasonable chance to move up in the standings. (See Web Opinion No. 9122-T: Commissioner of EP Rules League v. DK Yes Sir &amp; Evil Empire).  In making this determination, the SpotsJudge.com Court of Fantasy Football will award teams [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] benefits both teams if it allows both teams a reasonable chance to move up in the standings. (See Web Opinion No. 9122-T: Commissioner of EP Rules League v. DK Yes Sir &amp; Evil Empire).  In making this determination, the SpotsJudge.com Court of Fantasy Football will award teams [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

